CHILDREN'S VIEWS MUST BE HEARD — CUSTODY HURTS KIDS — AUSTRALIAN KIDS HAVE RIGHTS
rockoz
benevolent activism
rights of custody kids
australia
Horiz 800

The growth of a societal cancer

We are now looking at a 35 year old cancer that has been allowed to grow unchecked and is by far the most dangerous place for men, women and children, to come into contact with, in the event of relationship breakdown.

It has become a law unto itself, a dictatorship within a democracy. Secret and seemingly untouchable, it has been allowed to grow into a multi billion dollar industry, with many poisonous tentacles which have gradually and unnoticeably crept into many of our institutions and bureaucracies. These in turn have each spawned their own agencies and pseudo expert organizations and bodies, who play host to a variety of so called professional expert specialist advisers, who keep feeding the cancer with a continuous supply of misinformation and dodgy statistical data, which flows into the system, thereby guaranteeing malignant growth.

Each tentacle of this cancer is pushing its own immoral agenda, while at the same time comfortably feathering their nests with billions of dollars of taxpayer funded handouts, bolstered by the funds plundered from the hard earned family wealth of unsuspecting separating parents.

All of this is made possible because society has unsuspectingly and unquestionably accepted the deliberately deceptive and misleading "Best Interest of the Child" principle. It is an obscene act of deception to suggest that the "Best Interest of a Child" is best served by giving children rights, when in fact they lack the autonomy and physical ability to enact those rights and while their young developing brains are so vulnerable to emotional, and psychological manipulation and control.

Without question the most dangerous situation for a child to find itself in, is when its parents are coerced into entering the Family Court system. This ensures them being infected by this obnoxious Family Justice cancer, which in fact will guarantee that most of them will have their ties of kinship with many of their much loved biological family members severed.

This cancerous industry, which hides behind the spurious "Best Interest of the Child" principle, in order to justify the removal of these vulnerable children from perfectly loving and responsible family members, is a curse on the health and wellbeing of our society. To remove those who wish to protect and play a part in the healthy physical and emotional development of their biological family, is universally unacceptable to a civil society.
To allow this dangerous cancer to flourish will eventually destroy our society. We owe it to the children of today, who are the parents of tomorrow, to relieve them of the burden of being forcibly removed by this malignant societal cancer. If we fail to do so, history will judge us harshly. "Parental rebellion is not a crime, it is our obligation."


Peter van der Voorde works with a men's self-help group, Dads on the Air. Dads on the Air can be found at http://www.dadsontheair.net/.

 

--

Family Court hides public document from children and parents

Guidelines for the Child's Representative is a public document which exists :

  • to be used in training Independent Children's Lawyers (ICLs) who were previously called Child Representatives;
  • to provide guidance to the ICL in fulfilling their role;
  • to provide parents, children and others with information about the Court’s general expectations of the ICL.

Towards the beginning of 2007 the document was available under the tab Practice Directions on the main page of the Family Law website at this URL:
http://www.familycourt.gov.au/presence/
connect/www/home/directions/
guidelines_for_child_representatives/

During 2007 the document was moved to an obscure and difficult-to-find location at
http://www.familycourt.gov.au/presence/ resources/file/eb00014b208557d/
guidelines01.pdf where it is now available.

It is no longer to be found under the Family Law site tab Practice Directions.

rockoz.com speculates that pressure applied to the Family Court concerning lawyers who ignore the guidelines may have caused the Court to decide to "hide" the document in this way.

It may be that the Family Court is embarassed by the existence of a Practice Direction which is being openly flounted by Australian States and legal practitioners.

 

 

Study the Family Law ICL Guidelines for yourself.

The document Guidelines for the Child's Representatives is available HERE.

Use the INDEX to get an overview of the 12 sections.


Madeleine McCann

They're innocent; they sold her; someone stole her; they killed her; they're bad; they're martyrs.

Never before has one child's disappearance caused such a press/TV/Internet furore.

Praia de Luz. Portugal. The waiter. The neighbour. DNA. Dogs. Forensics. Hired car. Tapas bar.

What word or phrase can we find that will give a voice to the hundreds of thousands of Aussie kids who have been separated from one of their most important adults by the Family Court.?

Unfortunately, Section 121 of the Family Law Act makes it a crime to report the tragedy of broken lives left in its wake.

The Custardy Kids

 

HOME NEWS LOVE Australians All CENSORSHIP COLOURS Our Aim
Horiz 800